D-4 vs GDI - Pajero IO
Mitsubishi Pajero iO
Wednesday, December 31st, 2008

This versatile drive train enables the driver to decide whether the car should be a constant two-wheel drive or four-wheel drive, via the "Super Select" system used in the larger Pajero models. This system operates through a centre viscous coupling that distributes torque between front and rear wheels as appropriate. The selection is enabled by use of a dual-range gearbox. These controls are user friendly and simple to use. You will feel right at home with this vehicle almost as soon as you get in it. An inbuilt Multi Communication System on the dashboard displays vital details such as the average speed at last trip, average kilometres remaining fuel in the tank can take you and your CD player control. However, I got the feeling that the system would be better if it had a touch screen facility, mostly found in the iO’s sibling, the Mitsubishi Gallant.
The iO is good for soft off-roading and handles well on the highway. At between 105Kph and 110 Kph, GDI economy mode goes off and this allows the GDI engine to work overtime, meaning that overtaking is effortless. Torque output of 191 Nm @ 3500 rpm accords it generous take off pace. Handling especially off-road is good but there is a bit of under steering and over steering when going in and out of rear-wheel drive.

The iO has a power-assisted braking system uses discs at the front and drums at the rear. It has independent front suspension and a five-link live rear axle, a system also found in the bigger Pajero.
It beats the Rav4 in safety; has a driver’s side airbag as standard feature. At its launch in 1998, its makers said it "generates an image of being easy to get to know, easy to drive, and of being one's very own Pajero." Well, this is a simple, rough truck for the not-so-complicated.
Second Impression

Verdict
These cars cost about Ksh1 million each. Perhaps you don’t know this, but GDI and D-4 (also known as the 3S-FE) are almost similar engines systems in that fuel is injected directly to the cylinders. The Rav 4, not by surprise wins in aesthetics, interior styling and resale value, while the iO is better in soft off-roading. If you want to buy a Rav 4, go for the 1800CC VVti engine one. The iO has an 1800CC variant too, though still GDI. Both these vehicles have three door smaller siblings, which mostly appeal to singles. Among the duo, the Rav 4 delivers the better overall experience.
Catalog
Facebook Stream
Your Facebook session has expired, try to Connect
User login
Featured Car Classified
Autozine Magazine newsletter
Stay informed on our latest news!
Who's online
There are currently 0 users and 6 guests online.
Popular Content QT
- D-4 vs GDI - Pajero IO (2,664)
- UAZ From Russia With love (2,009)
- Importing a car from Japan (1,753)
- Nissan Sunny B-15 (1,097)
- The Penny Pinchers (1,083)














Comments
DI Technology
I know the article is pretty old :) but I happen to have just read it for the first time so hear goes.
...
the Toyota D4 engine on the 2000cc RAV4 (until 2002) is 1AZ-FSE not 3S-FE (Which is not a DI type engine anyway).
The D4 engine on the corona premio (until 2001) is 3S-FSE which was replaced by the 1AZ-FSE for the G edition when the Premio dropped the Corona bit.
I've noted that XXX-FSE toyota engines are DI.
VW:
What most people also do not know is that a good number of VW engines are DI's - all FSI engines are DI.
Incidentally VW have some biz relationship with Mitsubishi. ->
http://business.nikkeibp.co.jp/article/eng/20091215/211628/h01.jpg
--
Without regular service, I believe a DI type engine will give it's owner lots of problems. I've never had any issues with one for over 2 years.